71 Comments

Approximately 40% of Ukrainians have fled as refugees. Their homes, infrastructure and economic resources are devastated to near stone age conditions. The brave Ukraine military is winning stunning victories but being slowly degraded. Russia controls about 1/5 of Ukrainian land. And they have plenty more troops and assault equipment. They have not yet started strategic carpet bombing. And many US Republicans, along with authoritarian rulers in the global perspectives are whining about higher food and gas prices. Putin has personal security, and 322B$ of personal assets.

So….Putin is in a very powerful and secure position to advance his agenda.

Expand full comment

If Putin does conduct a tactical nuclear strike, that does not automatically mean nuclear retaliation by the West. Conventional military force can still do a lot of damage, so I would expect retaliation through that channel. If Putin brings out the nukes, it becomes an existential crisis for the West, and may lead Biden and the Europeans to conclude that it is far too dangerous to allow such an escalation to go unanswered. Mutually assured destruction kept the peace for over 50 years, and may do so again.

Expand full comment

WotR forgets escalation tactic #4: "Oops! the Ukrainian military attacked us at a nuke plant we occupied and now there's radiation all over Ukraine." That's the semi-nuclear, plausibly-deniable escalation tactic often overlooked. Iran can do this too any day it wants with an "Oops! a tanker spill in the Straits of Hormuz that cuts off 40% of global oil trade!" Never forget the "Oops!" form of escalation that's always there, because it's often the least-risky and most-deniable.

Expand full comment

A thought experiment…

Imagine if the United States military had trained and equipped the Ukrainian army as well as it had the Afghan army.

I say this to address JVL’s contention that we should have stayed in Afghanistan, in spite of the fact that the Afghans would not/did not fight their own conflict, whereas the Ukrainians are fighting with tremendous tenacity.

And the greater point is that while it was indeed painful (and shameful?) to leave Afghanistan, it was (and remains) the right strategic decision. I believe that our exit there was a necessary condition to enabling the U.S. to strategically focus on the rivals that really matter to it (i.e. Russia and China).

Expand full comment

I just got back from seeing "Mr. Landsbergis" at a documentary film festival. Even though it is FOUR HOURS long, I recommend it. It is a current interview with the former president of Lithuania, intercut with amazing footage from the late 80s, early 90s, when Lithuania was fighting for independence from the USSR. I won't go into all the many, many things that a) I learned about events that occurred in my adult lifetime that I had no idea about and b) the many ways that today's Ukrainian situation echoes that. But a big takeaway is that the Lithuanians showed the same kind of determined courage in the face of the USSR that we are seeing now. The unarmed, unprotected people in the streets protesting the Soviet soldiers and their tanks and guns...wow!

The film was released last year by Ukrainian director Sergei Loznitza, who, as the film was being screened here, was apparently driving from Germany to Poland to meet his parents, recently evacuated from Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

Of course I noticed the similarities. They really are quite glaring. Thank you J VL I really really do like your work

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

Re: Ukrainian Relief, Alexander and Rachel Vindman mention two groups I’ve never heard of. Moas.eu and VetVoicesFoundation. We could consider them.

Expand full comment

Thanks for Note 1. Exactly what I was thinking about the parallels. Yes, there is only one authoritarian playbook, whether you're Putin or Trump, or Hitler, who gave Trump his Big Lie. (BTW, it was Timothy Snyder who first called "the election was stolen" Trump's Big Lie, sometime in October, 2020.)

Expand full comment

I think it would be quite a coup for Tass to hire Tucker away from Fox. If he's just in it for $$$$ they would offer twice what Fox is paying him (well, maybe not now). Funny thing is, I don't think it's all performance.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

Compare and contrast the treatment of the millions of Ukrainian refugees flooding into Europe and the comparatively parsimonious and hostile treatment of a few thousand Iraqi, Afghan and Syrian refugees last fall. They were every bit as much victims of Putin and the Belarussian state as any leaving Ukraine now. And while the EU clutched their pearls they did very little to help.

This is not to say that we shouldn't be doing what we can for Ukrainian refugees but that we need to see that all refugees be treated equitably regardless of origin.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2022·edited Mar 5, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

I don't think there will be any nuclear attack, not as the situation stands at present. It is true that we've been told that Russians do not militarily separate nuclear from non-nuclear arms per general doctrine, but they do understand what those weapons do. And, what a blast would likely mean. If there are any narrow slices of possibility that incite NATO nations to get militarily involved, that blast is at the front of all of them.

Putin's political survival, especially considering how he publicly treats personnel important to his power, depends on not running from one kicked hornet nest to another, bigger, and unkicked nest.

Before I left on my walk to enjoy some podcasts and read through emails, I saw that there was a ceasefire in effect. I think this forks down two, nonexclusive paths.

Down A, Putin means to use the ceasefire to turn his attention back to domestic affairs and reconsolidate domestic political power. He spends his resources drawing the Western response to his aggression in starker anti-Russian terms and relates his struggle to his people's current struggles (for which he is wholly to blame).

Down B, the ceasefire is a way to create more oxygen for his next fireball of a move. B1, I think, is an Iron Curtain reintroduction encompassing Russia, Belarus, and one or several small "successor republics" he'll craft from what he's currently taken from Ukraine. NATO will not move against him militarily for any reason unless he kicks NATO's nest first.

My guess is he makes several mini-states from the spoils, as opposed to one small state. He can frame these as his "success", both domestically and in areas of Western political discourse that disfavor his enemies (which gets people like Sen. Graham back on his side, at least on Twitter, after Trump reaches down between his legs for what Putin has taken and lionizes Putin yet again).

I think B2 is a false flag operation that provides enough chaff for long enough that he can escalate his conventional attacks with deeper stocks of what Russia still has in its munitions. So long as the West never sees his guns run dry, he has the appearance of fangs.

Thanks, JVL and The Bulwark, for providing a space for all of us. Don't give up, and consider giving your money or time to help Ukraine and your fellow travelers.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

All thoughtful stuff, as usual. Be sure to include jdc.org in your how-to-help roundup.

Expand full comment

The Romilly Weeks Twitter video brought tears to my eyes. Yes, there is good in the world, there is all manner of good in the world... Ukrainian courage and European generosity.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2022Liked by Jonathan V. Last

JVL out there preachin’! That part about Putin being a caged animal in survival mode w/ the threat of potentially being deposed from w/in & escalating dramatically to “go big or go home” in a blaze of glory—a la our boy Adolf—worries me the most, not gonna lie.

Expand full comment

Very insightful - So many thanks !

Expand full comment
founding

JVL, thank you. Your work is so valuable to us all.

Expand full comment